Abstract
Introduction: Lead is an environmental contaminant, which is toxic to organ systems in human and other animals. The present study investigated the possible protective role of Ficus carica leaf extract, vitamin C or the combined treatment in lead acetate-induced hepatotoxicity.
Methods: One hundred and twenty-six adult male albino rats were divided into seven groups (n = 18). G1 (control group) received distilled water. G2 (lead acetate group) received lead acetate at a daily dose of 20 mg/kg body weight by gastric gavage. G3 (Ficus carica group) received Ficus carica leaves extract at a daily dose of 200 mg/kg body weight by gastric gavage. G4 (Ficus and lead group) received Ficus carica leaves extract followed by lead acetate after 20 minutes. G5 (vitamin C group) received vitamin C at a daily dose of 200 mg/kg body weight by gastric gavage, G6 (vitamin c and lead group) received vitamin C followed by lead acetate after 20 minutes. And, G7 (Ficus, vitamin C, and lead group) received Ficus carica leaves extract and vitamin C followed by lead acetate after 20 minutes. The treatment extended for six weeks, blood and specimens were collected at a 2-week interval. Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total protein (TP), direct bilirubin (DB), lipid peroxidation biomarker (Malondialdehyde (MDA)), antioxidants enzymes (Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reduced glutathione (GSH)) in liver tissue and histopathological changes in liver were investigated.
Results: Lead acetate caused significant increases in AST, ALT, ALP, DB and MDA levels. In addition, TP and level of SOD and GSH significantly decreased compared to the control group. The pre-treatment with the combination of Ficus carica and vitamin C improved liver parameters, the level of antioxidant enzymes as well as histopathological changes.
Conclusion: The combination of Ficus carica leaf extract and vitamin C had a remarkable protective action against lead acetate induced- oxidative damage in rats.
Introduction
Lead (Pb) is a heavy metal that is harmful. Thus, lead is one of the toxicants and persistent environmental pollutants affecting all biological systems through exposure to polluted air, water, and food 1. Lead has no beneficial role in body functions, cellular growth, proliferation, or signaling and there is no “safe” level of exposure has been reported 23. Lead has detrimental effects in humans and animals 4. The mechanisms of lead toxicity include oxidative damages in the cell membrane and other sub-cellular organelles, and disturbances in the process of gene expression 5.
Although the liver is not among the main targets for lead toxicity, it still vulnerable to lead toxicity 6. A previous study covering 4.556 males conducted on individuals with occupational diseases from lead poisoning, reported an increase in total mortality with digestive system diseases including chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis 7. In accordance, lead has been reported to induce Pb hepatotoxicity in terms of elevation in the levels of liver enzymes in the serum including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and abnormal hepatic cholesterol metabolism 8. Although the mechanism of lead-induced hepatotoxicity is not very clear 9, oxidative stress is a plausible mechanism of lead hepatotoxicity by causing lipid and protein peroxidation resulting in damaging membrane integrity and fatty acid composition 10, through two different pathways; first the generation of reactive oxygen species and second, the depletion of antioxidants 11.
Medicinal plants play an everlasting and growing role in treating common ailments especially in developing countries. Ficus carica is one of the largest genera of medicinal plants 12. Ficus carica L. has been reported to have numerous bioactive compounds including flavonoids, vitamins, enzymes, nicotinic acid, tyrosine, and other important constituents 13. Previous studies investigating the hepatoprotective activity of Ficus carica leaf extract in rats with liver damage showed that the extract remarkably decreased the levels of AST, ALT, bilirubin, MDA equivalents and TP concentration in the serum 1415. It is likely that the antioxidant potential of Ficus carica leaf extract is due to its high content of flavonoids 13. The ability of flavonoids to act as antioxidants depends on their molecular structure with multiple aromatic rings and hydroxyl groups 1617. Moreover, the hydroxyl groups together with the carbonyl groups donate electrons by performing resonance and scavenging free radicals to resolve oxidative stress 18.
Vitamin C (Vit. C), as a prominent antioxidant, is able to alleviate the oxidative-stress-related impairments in animal tissues 19. In addition, Vit. C also increases the availability of the vitamins required in ameliorating oxidative damages. Consequently, Vit. C is considerably able to restore the activity of antioxidant enzymes 20. Taken together, the antioxidant properties of Vit. C may attribute to its potential ability in scavenging free radicals as well as activating and generating other endogenous antioxidants 21. Additionally, Vit C protects low-density lipoproteins from oxidation and reduces the harmful oxidants in cells 22. Consistently, lead has been found to induce hepatotoxicity in terms of higher serum levels of AST, ALT and ALP enzymes, whereas Vit. C pre-treatment considerably protected against lead hepatotoxicity 2324.
Methods
Experimental animals: male adult Sprague Dawley rats (150-200 g) were kindly provided from NODCAR breeding center and kept for a week for acclimatization under normal conditions and constant temperature (25±1C°) with ad libitum water and food until starting the experiment. Rats were grouped and housed in a conventional clean facility according to the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of NODCAR. All the experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with international guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.
Chemicals
Lead acetate: lead acetate was purchased from El Gomhoureya For Drugs Trade & Medical Supplies (Zagazig, Egypt). Chemicals: All chemicals, unless specified otherwise, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Drug
Vit. C (ascorbic acid) tablets were purchased from the local pharmacy. It is manufactured by CID Company. Each tablet contains 1g ascorbic acid.
Ficus Carica leaf Extract preparation
The leaves of Ficus carica were washed with tap water and were shade dried for around one week and pulverized into coarse powder by a blender. The coarse powder was extracted with 70% aqueous EtOH by maceration at room temperature for 72 h maceration technique. The extract was subjected to filtration, and then the filtrate was concentrated in a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure 25. The dried concentrate was kept at 4° C till use.
Animal Grouping
Rats were divided into seven groups (n = 18). G1 (Control group) got refined water. G2 (Lead acetate group) was administered with lead acetate (20 mg/kg of body weight) using gastric tube 26. G3 (Ficus carica group) was administered with Ficus carica leaf extract (200 mg/kg of body weight) using gastric tube 15. G4 (Ficus extract + Lead acetate group) was administered with Ficus carica leaf extract (200 mg/kg of body weight) followed by lead acetate (20 mg/kg of body weight) after 20 minutes by using gastric tube. G5 (Vit. C group) was administered with Vit. C (200 mg/kg of body weight) using gastric tube 27. G6 (Vit. C + Lead acetate group) was administered with Vit. C (200 mg/kg of body weight) followed by lead acetate (20 mg/kg of body weight) after 20 minutes by using gastric tube. G7 (Ficus carica leaf extract + Vit. C + Lead acetate group) was administered with Ficus carica leaf extract (200 mg/kg of body weight) and vitamin C (200 mg/kg of body weight) followed by lead acetate (20 mg/kg of body weight) after twenty minutes using gastric tube.
Blood sampling and tissue preparation
Blood samples were collected at an interval of two weeks, into clean glass tubes. The tubes were centrifuged at 3000 r.p.m to separate serum. Serum samples were transferred into Eppendorf tubes and stored at -70oC before measuring the level of AST, ALT, ALP, TP and DB.
Serum AST and ALT activities were measured by the colorimetric method 28. Serum ALP activity was measured by the spectrophotometric method 29. Total protein was measured by a commercial kit 30. Direct bilirubin concentration was measured by the colorimetric method 31.
Liver tissues were then homogenized in 10 ml of Phosphate buffer (pH7.4). The homogenates were centrifuged at 100 000× g at 4° C for 20 min. The clear supernatant was used to measure the level of MDA, SOD, and GSH. Then parts from liver were fixed in 10 % formalin for histopathological examination. Reduced and oxidized glutathione levels were measured by HPLC-UV method 32, MDA levels were measured by HPLC-UV method 33. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was measured by spectrophotometer method 34.
Histopathological examination
Finally, histopathological examination was carried out on liver tissues under different treatments 35.
Statistical analysis
Data presented as means ± SE. One-way ANOVA followed by LSD test were used to evaluate significant differences from the control and sleep deprived groups. P< 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Statistical processor system support (SPSS) for Windows software, release 10.0 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL).
Results
Lead acetate treatment significantly (P<0.05) increased AST, ALT and ALP levels in rats as compared with control group, after 2, 4 and 6 weeks. Both Ficus and vitamin C pre-treatment significantly (p<0.05) decreased the elevating effect of lead on AST, ALT and ALP levels after 2, 4 and 6 weeks. Combined treatment with Ficus carica and Vitamin C remarkably abolished the effect lead on AST, ALT and ALP levels (Table 1Table 2Table 3).
Group | AST (U/L) after 2 weeks | AST (U/L) after 4 weeks | AST (U/L) after 6 weeks |
Control group (C) | 58.03 ± 0.225 b | 58.37 ± 0.166 b | 58.56 ± 0.049 b |
Lead acetate treated group (L) | 90.94 ± 0.369 a | 98.78 ± 0.477 a | 106.89 ±0.588 a |
% of change of control | 56.7% | 69.2% | 82.5% |
Ficus carica treated group (Fc) | 55.58 ± 0.201 a, b | 57.22 ± 0.301 a, b | 58.36 ± 0.151 b |
% of change of control | -4.2% | -1.9% | - 0.34% |
Ficus + Lead treated group (Fc+ L) | 75 ± 0.365 a, b | 68.83 ± 0.477 a, b | 61.61 ± 0.201 a, b |
% of change of control | 29.2% | 17.9% | 5.2% |
Vitamin C treated Group (Vit. C) | 54.67 ± 0.422 a, b | 56.44 ± 0.382 a, b | 57.28 ± 0.315 a, b |
% of change of control | -5.8% | -3.3% | -2.2% |
Vit. C + Lead treated group (Vit. C+ L) | 79.61 ± 0.203 a, b | 70.39 ± 0.416 a, b | 62.72 ± 0.315 a, b |
% of change of control | 37.2% | 20.6% | 7.1% |
Ficus + Vit. C + Lead treated group (FC+ Vit. C + L) | 76.5 ± 0.428 a, b | 69.17 ± 0.307 a, b | 58.5 ± 0.428 b |
% of change of control | 31.8% | 18.5% | - 0.10% |
Group | ALT (U/L) after 2 weeks | ALT (U/L) after 4 weeks | ALT (U/L) after 6 weeks |
Control group (C) | 44.61 ± 0.417 b | 44.63 ± 0.306 b | 44.68 ± 0.295 b |
Lead acetate treated group (L) | 98.87 ± 0.233 a | 106.03 ±0.141 a | 112.94 ± 0.245 a |
% of change of control | 121.6% | 137.6% | 152.8% |
Ficus carica treated group (Fc) | 41.17 ± 0.307 a, b | 42.93 ± 0.267 a, b | 44.57 ± 0.578 b |
% of change of control | -7.7% | -3.8% | -0.25% |
Ficus + Lead treated group (Fc + L) | 69.24 ± 0.112 a, b | 56.72 ± 0.185 a, b | 47.33 ± 0.128 a, b |
% of change of control | 55.2% | 27.1% | 5.9% |
Vitamin C treated Group (Vit. C) | 40.44 ± 0.419 a, b | 43.02 ± 0.344 a, b | 44.32 ± 0.248 b |
% of change of control | -9.3% | -3.6% | -0.8% |
Vit C + Lead treated group (Vit. C+ L) | 70.16 ± 0.201 a, b | 58.77 ±0.186 a, b | 48.18 ± 0.108 a, b |
% of change of control | 57.3% | 31.7% | 7.8% |
Ficus + Vit. C + Lead treated group (Fc+ Vit. C + L | 62.92 ± 0.233 a, b | 53.51 ± 0.174 a, b | 44.91± 0.072 b |
% of change of control | 41% | 19.9% | 0.52% |
Group | ALP (IU/ L) after 2 weeks | ALP (IU/ L) after 4 weeks | ALP (IU/ L) after 6 weeks |
Normal control group (C) | 115.52 ± 0.079 b | 115.54 ± 0.162 b | 115.54 ± 0.204 b |
Lead acetate treated group (L) | 140.21 ± 0.154 a | 153.83 ± 0.112 a | 162.35 ± 0.208 a |
% of change of control | 21.4% | 33.1% | 40.5% |
Ficus carica treated group (Fc) | 110.77 ± 0.105 a, b | 113.27 ± 0.209 a, b | 115.01 ± 0.069 b |
% of change of control | - 4.1% | - 1.9% | - 0.46% |
Ficus + Lead treated group (Fc+ L) | 128.96 ± 0.249 a, b | 121.69 ± 0.094 a, b | 116.61 ± 0.139 a, b |
% of change of control | 11.6% | 5.3% | 0.93% |
Vitamin C treated Group (Vit. C) | 109.32 ± 0.179 a, b | 112.72 ± 0.145 a, b | 114.65 ± 0.106 b |
% of change of control | - 5.4% | - 2.4% | - 0.77% |
Vit. C +Lead treated group (Vit. C+ L) | 131.21 ± 0.188 a, b | 123.72 ± 0.111 a, b | 117.83 ± 0.106 a, b |
% of change of control | 13.6% | 7.1% | 1.9% |
Ficus + Vit. C +Lead treated group (Fc+ Vit. C +L) | 126.8 ± 0.129 a, b | 120.12 ± 0.175 a, b | 115.01 ± 0.126 b |
% of change of control | 9.8% | 3.9% | - 0.46% |
Table 4 demonstrated that lead administration induced a significant reduction in TP concentration after two, four and six weeks compared to the control group. Meanwhile, administration of Ficus carica or vitamin C or Ficus carica and vitamin C caused a significant elevation in TP concentration compared to the lead-treated group.
Group | TP (g/ dl) after 2 weeks | TP (g/dl) after 4 weeks | TP (g/dl) after 6 weeks |
Normal control group (C) | 10.68 ± 0.011 b | 10.67 ± 0.025 b | 10.68 ± 0.029 b |
Lead acetate treated group (L) | 5.95 ± 0.013 a | 4.81 ± 0.010 a | 3.95 ± 0.050 a |
% of change of control | - 44.3% | -54.9% | -63% |
Ficus carica treated group (Fc) | 9.83 ± 0.012 a, b | 10.29 ± 0.009 a, b | 10.56 ± 0.025 a, b |
% of change of control | - 8% | -3.6% | -1.1% |
Ficus + Lead treated group (Fc+ L) | 8.66 ± 0.013 a, b | 9.51 ± 0.014 a, b | 10.31± 0.012 a, b |
% of change of control | -18.9% | -10.9% | -3.5% |
Vitamin C treated Group (Vit. C) | 9.80 ± 0.017 a, b | 10.26 ± 0.014 a, b | 10.47 ± 0.009 a, b |
% of change of control | -8.2% | -3.9% | -1.9% |
Vit. C + Lead treated group (Vit. C + L) | 8.42 ± 0.012 a, b | 9.22 ± 0.015 a, b | 10.05 ± 0.050 a, b |
% of change of control | -21.2% | -13.6% | -5.9% |
Ficus + Vit. C + Lead treated group (Fc+ Vit. C + L) | 9.12 ± 0.029 a, b | 10.09 ± 0.038 a, b | 10.56 ± 0.007 a, b |
% of change of control | -14.6% | -5.4% | -1.1% |
Table 5 demonstrated that lead administration caused a significant elevation in DB level after two, four and six weeks, compared to the control group. Pre-treatment with Ficus carica or vitamin C or the combined treatment significantly minimized the elevating effect of lead on DB level when compared to the control group after two and four weeks.
Group | DB (mg/ dl) after 2 weeks | DB (mg/dl) after 4 weeks | DB (mg/dl) after 6 weeks |
Normal control group (C) | 0.35± 0.025 b | 0.36 ± 0.019 b | 0.37 ± 0.014 b |
Lead acetate treated group (L) | 0.59 ± 0.013 a | 0.65 ± 0.008 a | 0.760 ± 0.021 a |
% of change of control | 71.6% | 88.3% | 105.4% |
Ficus carica treated group (Fc) | 0.27 ± 0.003 a, b | 0.31 ± 0.008 a, b | 0.350 ± 0.004 b |
% of change of control | -21.2% | -13.3% | - 5.4% |
Ficus +Lead treated group (Fc+ L) | 0.48 ± 0.011 a, b | 0.42 ± 0.007 a, b | 0.362 ± 0.004 b |
% of change of control | 38.8% | 16.7% | - 2.2% |
Vitamin C treated Group (Vit. C) | 0.27 ± 0.002 a, b | 0.30 ± 0.005 a, b | 0.34 ± 0.001 b |
% of change of control | -22.6% | -16.6% | -8.1% |
Vit. C + Lead treated group (Vit. C+ L) | 0.51 ± 0.015 a, b | 0.44 ± 0.008 a, b | 0.371 ± 0.002 b |
% of change of control | 46.1% | 22.2% | 0.27% |
Ficus +Vit C +Lead treated group (Fc+ Vit. C +L) | 0.43 ± 0.005 a, b | 0.38± 0.004 a, b | 0.35 ± 0.002 b |
% of change of control | 24.9% | 5.6% | - 5.4% |
Table 6 showed that administration of lead caused a significant elevation in MDA level after two, four and six weeks compared to the control group. Pre-treatment with Ficus carica or vitamin C or the combined treatment significantly minimized the elevating effect of lead on MDA level when compared to the control group after two and four weeks.
Group | MDA (nmol/g) after 2 weeks | MDA (nmol /g) after 4 weeks | MDA (nmol /g) after 6 weeks |
Control group (C) | 18.71 ± 1.66 b | 18.73± 0.43 b | 18.75 ± 1.66 b |
Lead treated group (L) | 37.32 ± 2.38 a | 43.78 ± 1.95 a | 47.53 ± 0.56 a |
% of change of control | 99.5% | 133.7% | 153.5% |
Ficus carica treated group (Fc) | 19.92± 0.37 b | 19.03 ± 0.89 b | 18.99 ± 0.31 b |
% of change of control | 6.5% | 1.6% | 1.28% |
Ficus + Lead treated group (Fc+ L) | 30.23±1.47a, b | 25.56 ± 0.71a, b | 19.68 ± 1.32 b |
% of change of control | 61.6% | 36.5% | 4.96% |
Vitamin C treated group (Vit. C) | 20.11 ± 0.64 b | 19.56 ± 0.94 b | 18.96 ± 1.19 b |
% of change of control | 7.5% | 4.4% | 1.1% |
Vit. C + Lead treated group (Vit. C+ L) | 32.68± 0.46 a, b | 27.78 ± 0.77 a, b | 20.64 ± 1.45 b |
% of change of control | 74.7% | 48.3% | 10.1% |
Ficus +Vit. C +Lead treated group (Fc+ Vit. C + L) | 27.15± 1.22 a, b | 19.57 ± 1.44 b | 18.34 ± 0.67 b |
% of change of control | 45.1% | 4.5% | - 2.2% |
Table 7 demonstrated that lead administration caused a significant decrease in GSH level after two, four and six weeks, compared to the control group. Pre-treatment with Ficus carica or vitamin C or the combined treatment significantly minimized the decreasing effect of lead on GSH level compared to the control group after two and four weeks.
Group | GSH (μmole/g) after 2 weeks | GSH (μmole/g) after 4 weeks | GSH (μmole/g) after 6 weeks |
Control group (C) | 14.1±0.21 b | 14.13+0.22 b | 14.09+0.28 b |
Lead treated group (L) | 9.59±0.69 a | 7.75+0.66 a | 6.24+0.45 a |
% of change of control | -31.9% | -45.2% | -55.7% |
Ficus carica treated group (Fc) | 12.7+0.24 b | 13.53+0.62 b | 14.05+0.59 b |
% of change of control | -9.9% | -4.3% | -0.28% |
Ficus + Lead treated group (Fc + L) | 8.79+0.79 a | 11.16+0.46 a, b | 13.87+0.40 b |
% of change of control | -37.7% | -21% | -1.6% |
Vitamin C treated group (Vit. C) | 13.28+0.57 b | 13.8+0.21 b | 14.01+0.52 b |
% of change of control | -5.8% | -2.3 | -0.66% |
Vit.C + Lead treated group (Vit. C + L) | 7.32+0.22 a, b | 10.03+0.21 a, b | 12.55+0.14 a, b |
% of change of control | -48.1% | -29% | -10.9% |
Ficus + Vit. C +Lead treated group (Fc+ Vit. C + L) | 10.13+0.62 a | 12.41+0.86 a, b | 13.98+0.73 b |
% of change of control | -28.2% | -12.2% | -0.78% |
Table 8 demonstrated that lead administration induced a significant reduction in SOD activity level after two, four and six weeks, compared to the control group. Pre-treatment with Ficus carica or vitamin C or the combined treatment significantly minimized the decreasing effect of lead on SOD activity compared to the control group after two and four weeks.
Group | SOD (U/g) after 2 weeks | SOD (U/g) after 4 weeks | SOD (U/g) after 6 weeks |
Control group (C) | 70.69 + 0.82 b | 70.63 + 0.65 b | 70.6 + 0.37 b |
Lead treated group (L) | 42.76 + 0.79 a | 37.49 + 1.64 a | 31.16 + 1.53 a |
% of change of control | -39.5% | -46.9% | -55.9% |
Ficus carica treated group (Fc) | 68.7+0.44 b | 68.82+0.58 b | 69.99+0.59 b |
% of change of control | -2.8% | -2.6% | -0.9% |
Ficus + Lead treated group (Fc + L) | 53.59+1.27 a, b | 62.61+1.16 a, b | 68.54+0.53 b |
% of change of control | -24.2% | -11.4% | -2.9% |
Vitamin C treated group (Vit. C) | 66.56+0.56 a, b | 67.93+0.61 a, b | 68.71+0.32 b |
% of change of control | -5.8% | -3.8% | -2.7% |
Vit. C + Lead treated group (Vit.C + L) | 52.62+0.81a, b | 60.51+0.20 a, b | 66.25+0.83 a, b |
% of change of control | -25.6% | -14.3% | -6.2% |
Ficus + Vit C + Lead treated group (Fc+ Vit. C + L) | 66.60+0.54 a, b | 69.83+0.27 b | 71.13+0.23 b |
% of change of control | -5.8% | -1.1% | 0.8% |
Histopathological examination
Histological examination of liver tissues of control group showed normal hepatocytes of hepatic lobule (Figure 1A, Figure 2A and Figure 3A). Lead acetate-treated animals exhibited parenchymatous degeneration of hepatocytes with severe necrosis and severe leucocytes infiltration throughout the experiment (Figure 1B, Figure 2B and Figure 3B). Treatment of Ficus carica extract and vit. C to control animals maintain the normal liver tissues (Figure 1C,E; Figure 2C,E and Figure 3C,E) Pre-treatment with Ficus carica extract and vit C alone or in combination remarkably provided a potential protective action against the histopatological effect of lead acetate in rat liver (Figure 1D,F,G; Figure 2D,F,G and Figure 3D,F,G).
Discussion
The liver performs three principal functions which are essential to the body: detoxification of many toxins, synthesis of proteins and bile, and storage of vitamins (A, D, E, and K) and glycogen 3637. The liver is a target organ of lead toxicity 38. The present study showed that lead caused a remarkable elevation in the enzymatic activity of ALT, AST, ALP and bilirubin levels. Elevation of liver enzymes in the serum may indicate inflammation or damage to liver cells which leak higher than normal amounts of liver enzymes, into the bloodstream, which can result in higher level of liver enzymes in the blood. The elevated MDA and decreased GSH levels might indicate an increase in lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress. This effect might be interpreted that lead may induce metabolic dysfunction through inhibition of enzymatic activities and disturbance in the oxidant/antioxidant status. In accordance, a recent study indicated that oral administration of lead acetate increased the activity of blood enzymes: alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase and a decrease of creatinine level in rats 39. It has been suggested that lead exposure induced metabolic disorders and biochemical changes in the liver 40. Consistently, previous studies showed that lead decreased blood glutathione (GSH), glutathione peroxidase, adenosine triphosphatase, and catalase but increased oxidized GSH and intracellular calcium in rat 413.
The pretreatment with Ficus carica leaf extract or Vit. C alone or the combined treatment noticeably prevented the effect of lead on serum AST, ALT, ALP activities, and direct bilirubin and total protein concentration in the serum compared to the lead acetate treated group after two, four and six weeks. The hepatoprotective effect of both Ficus carica leaf extract and Vit. C might be attributed to their antioxidant properties. In accordance, previous studies showed that pretreatment with Ficus carica leaf extract normalized the levels of TP, ALP and the level of total serum bilirubin 4215. Moreover, Ficus carica was highly successful in attenuating lead hepatotoxicity due to its high total phenol and flavonoid contents, suggested three mechanisms for this attenuation: first: lowering the oxidative stress, second: increasing the oxidant enzymes level and third: acting as chelating agent for lead ions 4344. The observation that vitamin C caused suppression of increased ALT and AST activities induced by administration of lead acetate might be attributed to its ability to ameliorate the lipid peroxidation through the free radicals scavenging activity and restoring the liver capability 4546. Collectively, the results revealed that the pretreatment with Ficus carica leaf extract only or Vit. C only improve the hepatotoxicity while the pretreatment with the antioxidant mixture containing both Ficus carica leaf extract and Vit. C was the most effective treatment in alleviating hepatotoxicity.
In accordance with the biochemical data, the histopathological examination of the liver tissues of the animals treated with lead showed that lead acetate-induced liver hyperplasia and apoptosis, plausibly mediated by oxidative stress in Kupffer cells. Pretreatment with Ficus carica leaf extract and Vit. C provided effective protection to the liver against harmful effects induced by lead acetate.
Conclusion
Our data concluded that the combination of Ficus carica leaf extract and Vit. C had a critical protective action on lead acetate- induced oxidative damage in rats due to their antioxidant/anti-radical properties. The combined treatment of Ficus carica leaf extract and Vit. C offered more effective protection compared to the individual treatments.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' Contributions
New YorkAll authors contributed equally in the study design, interpretation of the data and writing of the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Omar A. Farid and Dr. Fawkya A. El-Hodairy, Physiology Department- National Organization for Drug Control and Research, for their help and great effort during practical part.
Abbreviations
ALP: Alkaline phosphatase enzyme
ALT: Alanine aminotransferase
AST: Aspartate amino transferase
CAT: Catalase
DB: Direct bilirubin
HPLC: High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
MDA: Malondialdehyde
NODCAR: National Organization for Drug Control and Research
ROS: Reactive oxygen species
SOD: Superoxide dismutase
TP: Total protein
References
-
Patra
R. C.,
Rautray
A. K.,
Swarup
D..
Oxidative stress in lead and cadmium toxicity and its amelioration. Veterinary Medicine International.
2011;
2011
:
457327
.
-
White
L. D.,
Cory-Slechta
D. A.,
Gilbert
M. E.,
Tiffany-Castiglioni
E.,
Zawia
N. H.,
Virgolini
M..
New and evolving concepts in the neurotoxicology of lead. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.
2007;
225
:
1-27
.
-
Flora
G.,
Gupta
D.,
Tiwari
A..
Toxicity of lead: A review with recent updates. Interdisciplinary Toxicology.
2012;
5
:
47-58
.
-
Jackie
T.,
Haleagrahara
N.,
Chakravarthi
S..
Antioxidant effects of Etlingera elatior flower extract against lead acetate - induced perturbations in free radical scavenging enzymes and lipid peroxidation in rats. BMC Research Notes.
2011;
4
:
67-75
.
-
Ahamed
M.,
Siddiqui
M. K..
Low level lead exposure and oxidative stress: current opinions. Clinica Chimica Acta.
2007;
383
:
57-64
.
-
Hegazy
A. M.,
Fouad
U. A..
Evaluation of Lead Hepatotoxicity; Histological, Histochemical and Ultrastructural Study. Forensic Medicine and Anatomy Research.
2014;
2
:
70-9
.
-
Wilczyńska
U.,
Szeszenia-Dabrowska
N.,
Sobala
W..
[Mortality of men with occupational lead poisoning in Poland]. Medycyna Pracy.
1998;
49
:
113-28
.
-
Mohammadi
M.,
Ghaznavi
R.,
Keyhanmanesh
R.,
Sadeghipour
H. R.,
Naderi
R.,
Mohammadi
H..
Caloric restriction prevents lead-induced oxidative stress and inflammation in rat liver. TheScientificWorldJournal.
2014;
2014
:
821524
.
-
Sharma
Veena,
Sharma
Sadhana,
Pracheta
Sharma SH,
others
Lead induced hepatotoxicity in male swiss albino mice: the protective potential of the hydromethanolic extract of Withania somnifera. Int. J. Pharmaceu. Sci. Rev. Res.
2011;
7
:
116-121
.
-
Liu
C. M.,
Ma
J. Q.,
Sun
Y. Z..
Puerarin protects the rat liver against oxidative stress-mediated DNA damage and apoptosis induced by lead. Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology.
2012;
64
:
575-82
.
-
Flora
S. J..
Arsenic-induced oxidative stress and its reversibility. Free Radical Biology & Medicine.
2011;
51
:
257-81
.
-
Rashid
A.,
Khan
A. A.,
Dar
S. H.,
Nabi
N. G.,
Abdul Rashid Teli
A..
Phytochemical and therapeutic properties of Ficus carica Linn.: an overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research.
2017;
2
:
16-23
.
-
Gilani
A. H.,
Mehmood
M. H.,
Janbaz
K. H.,
Khan
A. U.,
Saeed
S. A..
Ethnopharmacological studies on antispasmodic and antiplatelet activities of Ficus carica. Journal of Ethnopharmacology.
2008;
119
:
1-5
.
-
Sehrawat
A.,
Khan
T. H.,
Prasad
L.,
Sultana
S..
Butea monosperma and chemomodulation: protective role against thioacetamide-mediated hepatic alterations in Wistar rats. Phytomedicine.
2006;
13
:
157-63
.
-
Aghel
N.,
Kalantari
H.,
Rezazadeh
S..
Hepatoprotective Effect of Ficus carica Leaf Extract on Mice Intoxicated with Carbon Tetrachloride. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.
2011;
10
:
63-8
.
-
Heim
K. E.,
Tagliaferro
A. R.,
Bobilya
D. J..
Flavonoid antioxidants: chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry.
2002;
13
:
572-84
.
-
Mohan
G. K.,
Pallavi
E.,
Kumar
B. R.,
Ramesh
M.,
Venkatesh
S..
Hepatoprotective activity of Ficus carica Linn. leaf extract against carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Daru : Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
2007;
15
:
162-6
.
-
Liu
C. M.,
Zheng
G. H.,
Ming
Q. L.,
Sun
J. M.,
Cheng
C..
Protective effect of quercetin on lead-induced oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress in rat liver via the IRE1/JNK and PI3K/Akt pathway. Free Radical Research.
2013;
47
:
192-201
.
-
Kojo
S..
Vitamin C: basic metabolism and its function as an index of oxidative stress. Current Medicinal Chemistry.
2004;
11
:
1041-64
.
-
Acharya
U. R.,
Mishra
M.,
Patro
J.,
Panda
M. K..
Effect of vitamins C and E on spermatogenesis in mice exposed to cadmium. Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.).
2008;
25
:
84-8
.
-
Chan
A. C..
Partners in defense, vitamin E and vitamin C. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology.
1993;
71
:
725-31
.
-
Soujanya
S.,
Lakshman
M.,
Anand Kumar
A.,
Gopala Reddy
A..
Histopathological and ultrastructural changes induced by imidacloprid in brain and protective role of vitamin C in rats. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research.
2012;
4
:
4307-18
.
-
Ajayi
G. O.,
Adeniyi
T. T.,
Babayemi
D..
Hepatoprotective and some haematological effects of Allium sativum and vitamin C in lead-exposed Wistar rats. International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences.
2009;
1
:
64-7
.
-
Chang
B. J.,
Jang
B. J.,
Son
T. G.,
Cho
I. H.,
Quan
F. S.,
Choe
N. H..
Ascorbic acid ameliorates oxidative damage induced by maternal low-level lead exposure in the hippocampus of rat pups during gestation and lactation. Food and Chemical Toxicology.
2012;
50
:
104-8
.
-
Trifunschi
S. I.,
Ardelean
D. G..
Ardelean. Flavonoid Extraction from Ficus Carica Leaves Using Different Techniques and Solvents. Zbornik Matice srpske za prirodne nauke.
2013;
125
:
79-84
.
-
Aldahmash
B. A.,
El-Nager
D. E..
The Protective Effect of Vitamin C Against Toxicity Induced by Lead Acetate on Liver and Spleen in Swiss Albino Mice. Pakistan Journal of Zoology.
2014;
46
:
1425-31
.
-
Aksoy
N. H.,
Vural
H.,
Sabuncu
T.,
Arslan
O.,
Aksoy
S..
Beneficial effect s of vitamins C and E against oxidative stress in diabetic rats. Nutrition Research (New York, N.Y.).
2005;
25
:
625-30
.
-
Reitman
S.,
Frankel
S..
A colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. American Journal of Clinical Pathology.
1957;
28
:
56-63
.
-
Belfield
A.,
Goldberg
D. M..
A colorimetric method for the determination of serum alkaline phosphatase. Enzyme.
1971;
12
:
561-8
.
-
Henry
R. J..
Clinical Chemistry: Principles and Techniques Harper & Row: New York; 1974.
Google Scholar -
Walter
M. I.,
Gerade
H. W..
A colorimetric method for the determination of serum bilirubin. Microchemical Journal.
1970;
15
:
231-43
.
-
Jayatilleke
E.,
Shaw
S..
A high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for reduced and oxidized glutathione in biological samples. Analytical Biochemistry.
1993;
214
:
452-7
.
-
Karatepe
M..
Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in human serum by HPLC-UV. LC GC North America.
2004;
22
:
362-5
.
-
Nishikimi
M.,
Appaji
N.,
Yagi
K..
The occurrence of superoxide anion in the reaction of reduced phenazine methosulfate and molecular oxygen. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.
1972;
46
:
849-54
.
-
D.
Bancroft, J.,
M.
Gamble,.
Ed. Edinburgh. Churchill Livingstone Pub. 2002.
Google Scholar -
Jaeschke
H.,
Gores
G. J.,
Cederbaum
A. I.,
Hinson
J. A.,
Pessayre
D.,
Lemasters
J. J..
Mechanisms of hepatotoxicity. Toxicological Sciences.
2002;
65
:
166-76
.
-
Ozougwu
J.
Physiology of the liver. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Biosciences.
2017;
4
(8)
:
13-24
.
-
Abdel-Wahhab
M. A.,
Omara
E. A.,
Abdel-Galil
M. M.,
Hassan
N. S.,
Nada
S. A.,
Saeed
A..
Zizyphus spina-christi extract protects against aflatoxin B1-initiated hepatic carcinogenicity. The Pan African Medical Journal.
2007;
4
:
248-56
.
-
Ibrahim
N. M.,
Eweis
E. A.,
El-Beltagi
H. S.,
Abdel-Mobdy
Y. E..
Effect of lead acetate toxicity on experimental male albino rat. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine.
2012;
2
:
41-6
.
-
Lazarenko
I. A.,
Mel’nykova
N. M..
[Comparison of blood biochemical indices in rats exposed to lead in macrodispersed form and nanoform]. Ukrainskii Biokhimicheskii Zhurnal.
2012;
84
:
85-9
.
-
Sharma
S.,
Raghuvanshi
B. P.,
Shukla
S..
Toxic effects of lead exposure in rats: involvement of oxidative stress, genotoxic effect, and the beneficial role of N-acetylcysteine supplemented with selenium. Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology.
2014;
33
.
-
Gond
N. Y.,
Khadabadi
S. S..
Hepatoprotective Activity of Ficus carica Leaf Extract on Rifampicin-Induced Hepatic Damage in Rats. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
2008;
70
:
364-6
.
-
Aziz
F. M..
Protective Effects of Latex of Ficus carica L. against Lead Acetate-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Rats. Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences.
2012;
5
:
175-82
.
-
Rahmani
A. H.,
Aldebasi
Y. H..
Ficus carica and its constituents role in management of diseases. Asian J Pharm Clin Res.
2017;
10
:
49-53
.
-
Ayoubi
A.,
Reza
V.,
Omidi
A.,
Abolfazli
M..
Protective Effects of Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid) in Lead Acetate Exposed Diabetic Male Rats: Evaluation of Blood Biochemical Parameters and Testicular Histopathology. Istanbul Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi.
2015;
41
:
84-91
.
-
Hussein
H. K.,
Elnaggar
M. H.,
Al-Dailamy
J. M..
Protective role of Vitamin C against hepatorenal toxicity of fenvalerate in male rats. Global Advanced Research Journal of Environmental Science and Toxicology.
2012;
1
:
60-5
.
Comments
Downloads
Article Details
Volume & Issue : Vol 5 No 10 (2018)
Page No.: 2733-2745
Published on: 2018-10-18
Citations
Copyrights & License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Search Panel
Pubmed
Google Scholar
Pubmed
Google Scholar
Pubmed
Google Scholar
Pubmed
Search for this article in:
Google Scholar
Researchgate
- HTML viewed - 7797 times
- Download PDF downloaded - 1239 times
- View Article downloaded - 0 times